Americans need to stop living beyond their means, both in government and their personal lives. For decades, we have spent and consumed much more than we produced, borrowing the difference from abroad.
So in 2010, our negative trade balance of payments exceeded $8 trillion and our total federal debt outstanding was almost $9.5 trillion – 65% of gross domestic product (GDP). The Federal Reserve estimates that the total debt of American companies, households and governments has surpassed $52.5 trillion.
The biggest threat to our economic future lies in the three major entitlement programs of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, all of which will expand to claim more federal dollars as our population ages. These three funds and other mandatory spending consumed 10% of GDP in 2010. That amount is expected to rise to 12% in 2021 and approach 16% in 2036.
If federal outlays rise as forecast by the Congressional Budget
There has been much talk about the nation’s deficits and debt recently, but a major obstacle to coping with future entitlements is that most Americans cherish their entitlements and other federal benefits.
Resisting economic necessity
In recent Gallup and Pew polls, 60% of voters indicated that maintaining entitlement programs at current levels was more important than reducing federal deficits. And many U.S. households and businesses receiving tax subsidies and other government benefits strongly resist having them reduced — even in order to lower deficits.
For example, the Business Roundtable favors cutting business tax rates, but recommends greatly expanding federal spending that aids its members. American farmers want to continue receiving subsidies and protective tariffs.
Motorists want low gasoline prices, so they oppose increasing gasoline taxes. But that tax is too low to maintain the nation’s roads and bridges. Unionized government employees want to keep receiving higher benefits than their private-sector counterparts, although many states cannot keep funding such benefits.
In 2009, more than 82% of that subsidy went to homeowners in the top 20th percentile of taxpayers, whose average income was $168,000 and whose average mortgage interest deduction was $2,357. Only 0.06% of the deduction went to homeowners in the lowest-earning 20%, where the average mortgage interest deduction benefit was $2.
In 2008, homeowners retained $30 billion from the exclusion of capital gains on home sales, and $29.5 billion from the exclusion of local and state property taxes. So, the total tax benefit to mostly wealthy homeowners in 2008 was collectively $147.5 billion.
Because more than 60% of U.S. households own homes, it is politically impossible to end the mortgage interest deduction. But the National Association of Realtors even opposes shifting the deduction to a tax credit, which would provide the same benefit per dollar of mortgage interest paid, regardless of the owner’s tax bracket.
This widespread desire to keep special benefits unchanged is affecting both political parties. Democrats are reluctant to cut entitlements. Republicans refuse to consider raising taxes. But most economists and budget analysts say revenue increases are crucial. Apparently, most Americans won’t accept reductions in government programs that benefit them.
In the past, millions of Americans made sacrifices when challenged. Examples are 1776, the Civil War, the period following the attack on Pearl Harbor, the Civil Rights movement, and most recently 9/11. To avoid a worsening economic crisis, more of us must be willing to accept some austerity. Unfortunately, few elected officials grasp that necessity.
It will take a major attitude shift among our leaders to convince most Americans they cannot keep living on money borrowed from abroad or taxes paid by other citizens. Those millions who remain unemployed, or are fighting overseas, are already making sacrifices. The rest of us should be willing to make sacrifices to prevent our economic situation from getting worse.
Tony Downs is a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution in Washington, D.C. Contact him at firstname.lastname@example.org or post your comment online.