Investment Notes
Financial services jobs are being more widely dispersed among the
nation’s office markets, creating opportunities for commercial
real estate investment in new cities. Of 1990’s top 10 financial
markets, three have been replaced by new, faster-growing markets, and
four of the remaining seven now have a lower concentration of financial
employment than they had 18 years ago (see chart below).
Traditional finance-oriented cities like New York; San Francisco;
Hartford, CT; and Wilmington, DE, have lost financial services jobs
over the past 20 years, while cities such as Charlotte, NC;
Minneapolis, and Phoenix have gained jobs in this sector, according to
a new report titled “A Seismic Shift in Finance?” by Arthur
Jones, an economist at CBRE Econometric Advisors.
In fact, total financial services employment among the top 10 financial
service markets as of 1990 decreased sharply as a share of total U.S.
employment, declining nearly 20 percent in the past 18 years, according
to Jones. At the same time, other major office markets picked up the
slack by either maintaining their share of finance jobs or adding to
their base.
Jones points out that New York and San Francisco are good examples of
this shift away from the clustering of financial jobs. “Both
markets have global links – San Francisco to Asia and New York to
Europe – that make them geographically and regionally relevant as
financial hubs,” he writes in the report. “At the same
time, the agglomeration effects that held such sway in the 1980s and
1990s have dissipated, meaning that back-office and support jobs that
were once located near financial hubs can be performed nearly anywhere
nationwide.”
Though this dispersion may be disappointing for owners of downtown
trophy assets in markets like New York and San Francisco, the shift of
these jobs may make emerging financial services markets more attractive
to commercial real estate investors.
Changes in the Concentration of Financial Employment
| 1990 |
2008 |
| Market |
Location Quotient |
Rank |
Market |
Location Quotient |
Rank |
| Hartford |
2.46 |
1 |
Wilmington |
2.10 |
1 |
| New York |
2.17 |
2 |
Hartford |
2.00 |
2 |
| Wilmington |
1.84 |
3 |
Stamford |
1.91 |
3 |
| San Francisco |
1.75 |
4 |
New York |
1.89 |
4 |
| Jacksonville |
1.64 |
5 |
Jacksonville |
1.66 |
5 |
| Dallas |
1.57 |
6 |
Charlotte |
1.56 |
6 |
| Newark |
1.49 |
7 |
San Francisco |
1.54 |
7 |
| Columbus |
1.47 |
8 |
Dallas |
1.53 |
8 |
| Stamford |
1.39 |
9 |
Minneapolis |
1.39 |
9 |
| Fort Lauderdale |
1.35 |
10 |
Phoenix |
1.34 |
10 |
Copyright 2009, Penton Media.. All
rights reserved. This article is protected by United States
copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be
reproduced, rewritten, distributed, re-disseminated, transmitted,
displayed, published or broadcast, directly or indirectly,in any medium
without the prior written permission of Penton Media.