Last month, Mills Corp. beat out a long list of bidders for the General Motors Pension Trust portfolio of malls. But the Arlington, Va.-based REIT's victory is based more on what the company is than what it offered to pay for the properties, says David Fick, an analyst with Legg Mason. The finalhas Mills paying $1.3 billion for 50 percent interest in nine malls, representing a cap rate of 6.4 percent. Financing will include assuming $170 million of property debt, $377 million of new mortgages and proceeds from a $275 million convertible preffered offer. The $200 million balance will come from Mills' credit facility or proceeds of pending asset or joint-venture sales. Mills will take over management duties on the properties from Taubman Centers.
Observers had been speculating for months that the malls would be sold outright to one REIT as a package. That's not how the transaction played out. ”This portfolio, while fully valued, did not go to the high bidders,” Fick says. “GM instead sold it to a preferred partner.” GM originally requested that bidders propose pricing for 50 percent of five malls and buy four of the lower-performing assets outright, he adds. But Mills put forth specific plans to boost productivity at each of the malls, including increasing occupancy levels and beefing up specialty leasing programs. These suggestions convinced GM to retain 50 percent interest in all nine centers.
The deal puts Mills one step closer toward establishing itself as a major player in the conventional regional mall business, rather than as a meremachine cranking out the trademark mega outlet malls it originated. Plans are under way to bring in new anchors, as well as entertainment and restaurant features to the malls. Also, the GM portfolio currently has about 15 kiosks per mall, and Mills expects to bring that number up to at least 20. Mills also plans to use its influence with retailers to draw in more tenants at the malls, raising occupancy levels from their current average of 81 percent. Fick predicts Mills will be able to raise the GM portfolio's average occupancy to at least 90 percent within 18 months. Two of the proprties involved, Columbus City Center in Ohio and Marley Station near Baltimore, will require more TLC than others since they are especially troubled.
|Mall||Location||GLA||Sales Per |
|Briarwood Mall||Ann Arbor, MI||983,000||$390||97%||1973|
|The Falls||Miami, FL||817,000||$433||91%||1980|
|Meadowood Mall||Reno, NV||889,000||$434||92%||1979|
|Stoneridge Mall||Pleasanton, CA||1.3 million||$473||96%||1980|
|Tuttle Crossing||Columbus, OH||1.1 million||$384||89%||1997|
|Columbus City Center||Columbus, OH||1.2 million||N/A||N/A||1989|
|Hilltop Mall||Richmond, CA||368,000||$247||89%||1976|
|Lakeforest Mall||Gaithersburg, MD||413,000||$340||82%||1978|
|Marley Station||Glen Burnie, MD||363,000||$352||81%||1987|
|Total/Weighted Average||8.4 million||$381||89%|
|Source: Company reports and Smith Barney estimates|