About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | For Search Partners | Privacy Policy

Sort by Date Relevancy

Home Current Issue Research Subscribe For Advertisers About Us/Contact Us Bookstore



Browse Back Issues


Latest Post:
Deer in the Headlights
Jan. 7, 2008

Property


Property


Resources and Services
Capital Markets Center
Retail Tenant Directory
Best of the Best

Developments
Industry News
Green Building News
Area Reviews
Executive Q&A

Property Types
Office
Multifamily
Retail
Industrial
Hotel
Mixed-Use
Seniors Housing

Classifieds

Finance
Net Lease/1031 Exchanges
REIT Updates
Investors
Capital Markets
CMBS

Strategies
Property Management
Corporate Real Estate
Technology
Tax Issues

Commentary
First Word
Financing Today
Money & Real Estate
Tax Notes
Washington Wire
National Multi Housing Council
Mortgage Bankers Association
Brokerage Insights
Landmarks & Leaders
World Beat
Last Word

Technology

Related Links
Retail Traffic
Industry Associations
Data Points








Q&A with Paul Domb, vice president of asset management at United Trust Fund (UTF)

Alex Stallings

Mar 1, 2008 12:00 PM



      Subscribe in NewsGator Online  Subscribe in Bloglines

Paul Domb: In times of economic uncertainty, companies want to monetize their real estate

Corporate real estate owners have been using sale-leasebacks to unlock capital for decades, but Paul Domb, vice president of asset management at United Trust Fund (UTF), says that in these uncertain economic times many companies are turning up the sofa cushions looking for revenue. Contrary to assertions that the sale-leaseback business will be dragged down by the current economic soft patch, Domb predicts a healthy year at the company founded by his father, Sidney, 37 years ago. Sidney remains company president.

In an age where an increasing number of real estate firms seek to broaden their scope or even become a one-stop shop for their clients, Miami-based UTF has focused on one niche exclusively since its inception: sale-leasebacks. Last year, UTF bought about $400 million worth of properties across the spectrum of commercial real estate, both with its own investment capital and as a joint-venture partner with GE Real Estate Finance.

UTF's clients include heavy hitters GMAC and Wells Fargo in the office arena: Robertshaw Industrial Products and Boise Cascade on the industrial front; and CVS Pharmacy and Wild Oats Markets in retail. NREI spoke with Paul Domb about the state of sale-leasebacks.

NREI: Are companies more interested in sale-leaseback deals today?

Domb: I've read that the sale-leaseback industry was crushed in 2007, but we didn't see it. Last year was strong, and this year has started strong as well, especially repeat business with long-standing clients. The motivation for doing sale-leasebacks is stronger now than before as companies look for new sources of revenue.

Raising capital isn't as easy as it used to be. A lot of financial institutions now want to do sale-leasebacks. In fact, the last time I saw so many financial institutions interested in sale-leasebacks — often involving bank branch locations — was about 15 years ago. It's a way to produce earnings when they have a problem in their mortgage portfolios.

NREI: Isn't that risky business for you?

Domb: There are some deals that we wouldn't consider, especially if the companies are too small. But despite the problems that they're having, a good many regional and national companies are solid operations that will overcome their subprime mortgage exposure. We'll get an income stream from them for the next 15 or 20 years. For our part, we have a strong interest in buying bank branches, just as we did 15 years ago. They tend to represent solid investments, both in terms of leases and real estate value.

NREI: How will 2008 compare with 2007 for your deal volume?

Domb: We're anticipating a large increase in deal volume over 2007, larger than 2007's increase over 2006 — and that was a 20% increase. That's contrary to the doom and gloom you're hearing. But for us, this year is business as usual, only better.

NREI: Have lease terms changed along with the changing market conditions?

Domb: Yes, the length of the leases had been shortening over the last three to five years due to customer demand. Five-, seven- or 10-year terms had become common. If the lease term is shorter, the company can book the revenue over a shorter period. But as of last year, 15-year and even 20-year terms were making a comeback in the marketplace. We hadn't entered into many 20-year deals in the 2000s, but now companies are looking to stretch out the lease terms to get the lowest possible lease rate. It's a trend that I expect to continue for the foreseeable future.


Get Copyright ClearanceWant to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2007 Penton Media, Inc.








Events
Editorial Calendar

Events
Newsletter


blank



 
Back to Top

blank
© 2007 Penton Media, Inc. About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | For Search Partners | Privacy Policy
blank