If we make it over the fiscal cliff, good times may be ahead for apartment builders—though that’s a big “if.”
“Assuming current trends hold, over the rest of this decade, we will need at least 300,000 new apartments annually, and possibly as many as 400,000, to meet demand,” says Mark Obrinsky, vice president of research and chief economist for the National Multi Housing Council.
That would be great, if it happened. Right now multifamily developers are happy to be building at a rate slightly faster than 250,000 a year. Most apartment analysts think market will be able to absorb that new construction—but not too much more.
NMHC’s Obrinsky says demand for apartments will soon be as strong as it was before thecrisis. Ostensibly, that is not a radical suggestion, but this week’s events illustrate a potential problem. More chaos in Congress jolted the markets on Friday, driving the Dow Jones Industrial Average down more than 100 points. Investors worry that the collapse of budget talks may lead the country back into recession. It seems that every time our economic recovery has begun to pick up speed over the last few years, something has happened that makes investors question their most basic assumptions about growth and demand. Uncertainty in Europe has been followed by uncertainty in the Middle East, more uncertainty in Europe, and now uncertainty in Washington, D.C.
Despite these challenges, strong demographics help apartments. The number of people who are in the age group most likely to rent apartments—20 to 34 years old—will grow by 2.4 million people over next five years. That’s the fastest rate of growth for that age group since the early 1980s. The demand from Echo Boomers entering the work force and renting apartments plus rising immigration levels will continue to “significantly surpass newof rental units,” according to analysis from Marcus & Millichap.
Developers have taken out permits to build new multifamily housing at an annualized, seasonally-adjusted rate of more the 250,000 a year every month since summer 2012, according to Census. The rate was 296,000 in November—more than twice the rate of construction just after the recession, when almost the only projects built were financed with federal housing subsidies. Housing economists expect “continued, modest growth” in new-home construction through 2013, says David Crowe, chief economist for the National Association of Home Builders.
Before the crash, new construction of more than 300,000 apartments a year was normal. However, to push the new construction towards 400,000 a year will require a stronger recovery than we have seen yet. The number to watch is new household formation. The decade from 2000 to 2010 had the slowest household growth in U.S. history, averaging just 1.0 percent a year. That’s largely because of the Great Recession, which caused many households to double up and led to reduced immigration. In comparison, from 1990 to 2000, the number of households grew by roughly 1.2 percent. The return of that kind of household formation, combined a strong share of those new households choosing to rent apartments will push demand higher, to a maximum of 437,000 a year from 2013 to 2000, say Obrinsky.
Reading today’s bad news, it’s nice to hear something positive. However, even NMHC’s happy prediction comes with a caveat: “Financing constraints, rising construction costs and traditional NIMBY opposition could keep actual construction below that level,” says Obrinsky.