After a few tough years, Gap Inc. may have found the right turnaround strategy.
Gap’s plan, as was laid out by CEO Glenn Murphy during the firm’s first quarter earnings call in May, is to concentrate on its value-based businesses (including its outlet and Old Navy divisions), grow its online sales and continue to expand internationally.
To that end, last year the Gap launched its Web site in 90 new countries and opened its first locations in China and Italy—some of which have already become among the highest-performing locations in the firm’s portfolio.
When it comes to its flagship brand, Gap plans to close up to 200 full-line Gap stores over the next two years and cut the square footage at all of its wholly-owned stores by approximately 2 percent, after already reducing the fleet by 2 percent in 2010. As of the end of the first quarter, the company operated 37.8 million square feet of retail through its wholly-owned units. It ran a total of 3,245 stores, including franchise locations.
Within the Old Navy division, Gap plans to reduce the overall square footage of the concept by switching to smaller-format stores. In addition, the company will open between eight and 10 Athleta stores this year, the women’s athletic apparel concept Gap acquired in September 2008. (The brand previously exclusively sold goods online, but Gap launched a bricks-and-mortar operation that has since become one of its better performing divisions.)
Banana Republic stores should remain untouched.
The majority of the 75 new stores the Gap plans to open in North America in fiscal 2011 will be outlet stores rather than full-line locations. The retailer also wants to grow its online business.
What it all adds up to is that, if the firm’s strategy works, owners of class-A malls will end up with a stronger tenant, while those with class-B and class-C properties may face the prospect of Gap shuttering locations.
“I would say in terms of turning themselves around, Gap is just rounding first base,” says Craig Johnson, president of Customer Growth Partners, a New Canaan, Conn.-based consulting firm. “They are still overstored and over-square-footed. They began to shrink their fleet and have made progress there, but they still have a long way to go.”
Righting the ship
The recent developments are welcome poster child for what ailed U.S. specialty apparel chains during the past decade.for a company that served as the
For a while, it seemed the retailer didn’t know which way to turn as it struggled with design issues, closed hundreds of stores and at one point, contemplated putting itself on the block.
The turning point may have come in 2010, when Gap finally started posting increases in same-store sales and shrinking its Old Navy square footage.
Gap’s new focus on value fits better with current economic environment, where shoppers want affordable prices and value-oriented retailers have been outperforming most other chains, according to David Solomon, president of NAI ReStore, a Narberth, Pa.-based retail real estate services firm. Further pruning down full-line Gap locations is also a smart move.
“There has been somewhat of a decline of class-B and class-C malls and they don’t necessarily need to have a Gap in these,” Solomon says.
That’s not to say that all of Gap’s troubles are behind the firm.
As of May, Gap stores averaged approximately $335 in sales per square foot, while Old Navy stores produced $280 in sales per square foot, according to J.P. Morgan estimates. Both figures are below ICSC’s estimated average of $365 in sales per square foot for all non-anchor apparel mall tenants. (Banana Republic stores average $480 in sales per square foot).
Gap’s fashion choices have been criticized for being too similar to a number of other specialty apparel chains, according to analysts from-based Morningstar. That is particularly troubling since the U.S. market has seen the proliferation of fast-fashion retailers, including Zara, H&M and Forever 21. Those firms have gained market share at the expense of Gap.
Forever 21’s share of the U.S. specialty apparel market grew from 1 percent in 2003 to 6 percent last year, according to research from J.P. Morgan. H&M’s share increased from 1 percent to 3 percent. During the same time period, Old Navy’s share of the market dropped 600 basis points, to 11 percent; the Gap’s dropped 700 basis points, to 8 percent; and Banana Republic’s 100 basis points, to 5 percent.
The competition with the fast-fashion chains is likely to be even more fierce in overseas markets like Europe and Asia, where consumers tend to be more fashion-forward than in the U.S., warn Morningstar’s analysts.
“Although Gap has gained some initial popularity in select markets in Asia by marketing Western [apparel] to consumers, we believe it will have to work hard to retain these customers by differentiating itself from existing casual apparel brands in the region, such as Giordano and Uniqlo, which have 1,800 and 800 stores, respectively,” they wrote in a May 24 note. “In our view, Gap will have to offer something unique and constantly keep up with the latest trends in different regions in order to attract customers into its stores.”
As a result, Johnson cautions that Gap should approach international expansion carefully, first focusing on fixing its merchandising problems.
Even putting aside fast fashion retailers, Gap has struggled to differentiate itself from its closest peers in the U.S. apparel market. J.Crew, for example, has been “out-Gapping Gap” for some time, says Solomon.
Domestic casual apparel retailers all suffer to some degree from being too bland, according to Johnson. For example, in the first quarter, American Eagle Outfitters reported an 8 percent decrease in same-store sales, while Aeropostale reported a 7 percent decrease. Gap Inc. reported a 3 percent decline in same-store sales at its Gap North America division, a 1 percent decline at Banana Republic stores and a 2 percent decline at Old Navy.
Too many locations
Gap’s problems have been compounded by the fact that it has locations in virtually every mall in the country.
“If you have unexceptional product and you have 400 units it’s one thing,” Johnson notes. “But if you have 1,500 units, it s a different issue. Gap suffers more because of its size.”
He believes that Gap would be better off operating 700 stores under its namesake label in the U.S., and adds that Old Navy could stand to cut the bottom 5 to 10 percent of its store fleet.
Full-line Gap stores present the biggest issue for the company from a merchandising and design standpoint, according to a May 17 note from J.P. Morgan analyst Brian J. Tunick. While Old Navy has had a rough couple of months of late, Tunick feels its repositioned focus on younger and minority consumers should help it in the long run. He also notes that smaller footprints at remodeled Old Navy stores have made the stores more profitable, and that’s a strategy Gap Inc. plans to pursue going forward.
Often, Old Navy stores take up two levels in a mall, when they only need one, adds Johnson.
He notes that the company’s desire to put more energy into the outlet business is sensible given the current popularity of the outlet format, but cautions that even in that space the Gap already has a visible presence.
“The outlets can be at least a modest source of growth,” for them, Johnson says. He estimates there might be room to open an additional 20 to 30 stores in the United States.
The key to getting ahead, however, should still be merchandising.
The Gap has an advantage over some of its competitors in that it operates a very well-known brand, according to both Johnson and Solomon. It now has to come up with products that will live up to its considerable brand equity.