When will the retail sector recover? The answer depends on how recovery is defined. Property owners consider a drop in vacancies and a reversal from negative to positive rent growth as the first signs of a recovery. Some investors define recovery as the point at which rents return to their previous peak levels.
For investors and researchers who focus on transaction prices, the sector won’t fully recover until property values creep up to pre-2008 levels.
Investors should expect retail rents and occupancies to continue to slide for the next four to six quarters, with vacancies stabilizing and rent growth turning positive sometime in late 2011 or early 2012.
Effective rents nationally will not recover to peak levels reached in 2008 until approximately 2016. Property values may not return to 2007 levels until after 2016, despite
Weak vital signs
The continuing plight of retail properties in the second quarter reflects the tepid, uneven pace of economic stabilization and recovery. Real estate fundamentals at neighborhood and community centers continued to slide at the national level, with the market giving up 1.85 million sq. ft. of occupied space.
Developers also have pulled back, bringing less than 400,000 sq. ft. of strip mall space on line, the lowest quarterly level of new completions on record since Reis began publishing quarterly data in 1999.
The decline in occupied space pushed vacancy levels to 10.9% in the second quarter of 2010, slightly under the 11% vacancy level last seen in 1991. Asking and effective rents continued to decline, falling by 0.3% and 0.5% respectively.
Larger property types like regional malls were not spared. The second-quarter mall vacancy rate of 9% is the highest on record since Reis began tracking regional malls in 2000.
Asking rents for regional malls fell by 0.2% in the second quarter, the seventh straight quarter of rent declines since the fourth quarter of 2008. This is the first time in nearly 10 years that Reis has observed rent declines for seven straight quarters.
Given that Reis doesn’t expect rents to resume positive growth until 2012, it is not surprising that we may need to wait until 2016 before we claw our way back to previous rent peaks attained in early 2008.
Valuation increases lag rent growth
The question of when property values will revert to previous heights is a tougher issue given the unpredictability of the ebb and flow of investor sentiment. Currently there is a small sliver of properties changing hands at cap rates ranging between 5% and 6%, levels unseen since 2006.
These properties tend to be Class-A properties located in primary markets, or gateway cities with a stabilized roster of tenants boasting long-term leases with little rollover risk.
However, there have been few of these low cap-rate transactions, and average prices have yet to show an increase. Among neighborhood and community centers that changed hands in the first quarter of 2010, the average sales price was $133 per sq. ft., down about 35% from peak levels in 2007.
Investors typically want evidence of positive rent growth before considering riskier properties. A recovery in valuations nationwide typically will lag a recovery in rent growth by two to four years. That means valuations may not return to the peak levels of 2007 until after 2016.
The next six to 12 months will require investors to make key assessments and decisions about prices and timing. Are Class-A retail properties now trading at prices that negate the prospects of quick appreciation? Should they begin investing in riskier properties in tertiary markets that might hover at lower price points?
Armed with the knowledge that rents are expected to turn positive by 2012 nationally, that a return to peak rent levels will occur by 2016, and that valuations will not return to their peak levels until after 2016, smart investors can maximize their opportunities in the retail sector.
Victor Calanog is director of research for New York-based research firm Reis Inc. His monthly column delivers insights on performance trends in commercial real estate.